Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2007-06-05 12:27.
Jefferson is a loser and should be thrown to the wolves, but he only took about $100,000. Compared to Conyngham, Foggo, Abramoff. This is nothing. Now he does have 16 counts against him, is the number of counts the methodology? Maybe the methodology should be the severity of the crime. Or how much they took. But to go by number of counts, stil wouldn't make him the most corrupt. Unless new information comes out, the things that Conynham did are much worse then Jefferson.
How is most corrupt determined?
Jefferson is a loser and should be thrown to the wolves, but he only took about $100,000. Compared to Conyngham, Foggo, Abramoff. This is nothing. Now he does have 16 counts against him, is the number of counts the methodology? Maybe the methodology should be the severity of the crime. Or how much they took. But to go by number of counts, stil wouldn't make him the most corrupt. Unless new information comes out, the things that Conynham did are much worse then Jefferson.